<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The walled garden of Open Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boldlyopen.com/2007/03/16/the-walled-garden-of-open-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boldlyopen.com/2007/03/16/the-walled-garden-of-open-source/</link>
	<description>To boldly muse about Open Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:18:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalibor Topic</title>
		<link>http://boldlyopen.com/2007/03/16/the-walled-garden-of-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-39227</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalibor Topic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabellino.it/blog/2007/03/16/the-walled-garden-of-open-source/#comment-39227</guid>
		<description>Different horses for different courses. 

For the sort of products where organizations building them perceive proprietary competition based on their own code to be undesirable, the GPL is a great way to make that hard. For the sort of products where adoption in proprietary competition is desirable, more permissive legal terms are more effective (hence LGPL, GPL+linking exception, MIT, Apache, ...).

As long as proprietary software vendors exist, both approaches will have their uses, both in providing a &#039;conversion path&#039; to becoming free software vendors, and in providing platforms to compete with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different horses for different courses. </p>
<p>For the sort of products where organizations building them perceive proprietary competition based on their own code to be undesirable, the GPL is a great way to make that hard. For the sort of products where adoption in proprietary competition is desirable, more permissive legal terms are more effective (hence LGPL, GPL+linking exception, MIT, Apache, &#8230;).</p>
<p>As long as proprietary software vendors exist, both approaches will have their uses, both in providing a &#8216;conversion path&#8217; to becoming free software vendors, and in providing platforms to compete with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gianugo</title>
		<link>http://boldlyopen.com/2007/03/16/the-walled-garden-of-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-37108</link>
		<dc:creator>Gianugo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabellino.it/blog/2007/03/16/the-walled-garden-of-open-source/#comment-37108</guid>
		<description>Matt, I agree there is a lot of room under the sun for everyone to cooperate, and I do agree that the current definition of Open Source allows for various business models around it. And actually, the point it&#039;s not really about GPL or no GPL, my point is about walled gardens vs. software commons. Which both might relate to carrot farming, by the way. :-) 

As per your speaker layout, that&#039;s definitely most impressive. and I will definitely miss not being able to attend OSBC (again). I wish you all the best, and will be looking for podcasts and video recordings!.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, I agree there is a lot of room under the sun for everyone to cooperate, and I do agree that the current definition of Open Source allows for various business models around it. And actually, the point it&#8217;s not really about GPL or no GPL, my point is about walled gardens vs. software commons. Which both might relate to carrot farming, by the way. <img src='http://boldlyopen.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>As per your speaker layout, that&#8217;s definitely most impressive. and I will definitely miss not being able to attend OSBC (again). I wish you all the best, and will be looking for podcasts and video recordings!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Asay</title>
		<link>http://boldlyopen.com/2007/03/16/the-walled-garden-of-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-37102</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Asay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rabellino.it/blog/2007/03/16/the-walled-garden-of-open-source/#comment-37102</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s fine to have different views of how best  to do open source projects and open source businesses.  I, as you know, fall into the GPL camp.  Both because I want to ensure freedom and profits for my company (though I&#039;d take freedom before profits, if it came to that, and would become a carrot farmer, like you :-).  

But I respect the BSD/Apache camp, and I think there&#039;s room for both, and certainly room to build businesses with both.  So take Eben&#039;s keynote as just one of several, each of which offers a different perspective on the market.  I think you&#039;d find that Rob Curley&#039;s will warm your heart, even if Eben&#039;s chills it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s fine to have different views of how best  to do open source projects and open source businesses.  I, as you know, fall into the GPL camp.  Both because I want to ensure freedom and profits for my company (though I&#8217;d take freedom before profits, if it came to that, and would become a carrot farmer, like you <img src='http://boldlyopen.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  </p>
<p>But I respect the BSD/Apache camp, and I think there&#8217;s room for both, and certainly room to build businesses with both.  So take Eben&#8217;s keynote as just one of several, each of which offers a different perspective on the market.  I think you&#8217;d find that Rob Curley&#8217;s will warm your heart, even if Eben&#8217;s chills it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

