<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of Oracle, Sun and Open Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boldlyopen.com/2009/04/20/of-oracle-sun-and-open-development/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boldlyopen.com/2009/04/20/of-oracle-sun-and-open-development/</link>
	<description>To boldly muse about Open Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 02:48:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Are liberal licenses a better future proofing? - Technology</title>
		<link>http://boldlyopen.com/2009/04/20/of-oracle-sun-and-open-development/comment-page-1/#comment-83749</link>
		<dc:creator>Are liberal licenses a better future proofing? - Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boldlyopen.com/?p=389#comment-83749</guid>
		<description>[...] conference, I looked up Gianugo Rabellino&#8217;s blog and read his then most recent blog article, &quot;Of Oracle, Sun and Open Development&quot; about the impact of M&amp;A on open source investment protection. The conclusion I draw from his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] conference, I looked up Gianugo Rabellino&#8217;s blog and read his then most recent blog article, &quot;Of Oracle, Sun and Open Development&quot; about the impact of M&amp;A on open source investment protection. The conclusion I draw from his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niq</title>
		<link>http://boldlyopen.com/2009/04/20/of-oracle-sun-and-open-development/comment-page-1/#comment-83691</link>
		<dc:creator>niq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boldlyopen.com/?p=389#comment-83691</guid>
		<description>Interesting thesis.  Sufficiently interesting I felt compelled to respond: http://bahumbug.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/he-told-us-so/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thesis.  Sufficiently interesting I felt compelled to respond: <a href="http://bahumbug.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/he-told-us-so/" rel="nofollow">http://bahumbug.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/he-told-us-so/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: He told us so! &#171; niq&#8217;s soapbox</title>
		<link>http://boldlyopen.com/2009/04/20/of-oracle-sun-and-open-development/comment-page-1/#comment-83690</link>
		<dc:creator>He told us so! &#171; niq&#8217;s soapbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boldlyopen.com/?p=389#comment-83690</guid>
		<description>[...] being orphaned and its users left in limbo despite MySQL being open source (GPL)!  His thesis (here) is that if Oracle wants to stifle MySQL, they can make it very unrewarding for anyone else to pick [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] being orphaned and its users left in limbo despite MySQL being open source (GPL)!  His thesis (here) is that if Oracle wants to stifle MySQL, they can make it very unrewarding for anyone else to pick [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph A. di Paolantonio</title>
		<link>http://boldlyopen.com/2009/04/20/of-oracle-sun-and-open-development/comment-page-1/#comment-83687</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph A. di Paolantonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boldlyopen.com/?p=389#comment-83687</guid>
		<description>I agree with all that you&#039;re saying about licensing and open core strategies. But it seems that Oracle has been a good open source player with InnoDB and BerkeleyDB/Sleepycat and might be so with MySQL, Glassfish, Mural MDM projects and the other F/LOSS projects being acquired with the Sun deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with all that you&#8217;re saying about licensing and open core strategies. But it seems that Oracle has been a good open source player with InnoDB and BerkeleyDB/Sleepycat and might be so with MySQL, Glassfish, Mural MDM projects and the other F/LOSS projects being acquired with the Sun deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
